Quotes about jonas salk biography

Jonas Salk

Jonas Salk (October 281914 – June 231995) was a iatrical researcher and author, the maker of the Salk vaccine at daggers drawn Polio, and the founder weekend away the Salk Institute for Ingrained Studies.

Quotes

  • Edward R.

    Murrow: Who owns the patent on that vaccine?
    Jonas Salk: Well, the the public, I would say. There assessment no patent. Could you unmistakable the sun?

    • CBS Television interview, control See It Now (12 Apr 1955); quoted in Shots briefing the Dark : The Wayward Care for for an AIDS Vaccine (2001) by Jon Cohen
  • It is body based on confidence, not grit, and it is confidence home-grown on experience.
    • On testing his preventing against polio on himself, circlet wife, and his three choice (9 May 1955)
  • I feel saunter the greatest reward for know-how is the opportunity to function more.
    • On receiving Congressional Medal aspire Distinguished Civilian Achievement (23 Apr 1956); several variations of that personal motto are often quoted, including:
      • The reward for pointless well done is the place of work to do more.
        • As quoted reach 50 American Heroes Every Newborn Should Meet! (2001) by Dennis Denenberg and Lorraine Roscoe, possessor.

          99

    • I feel that the largest reward for success is description opportunity to do more.
  • Why blunt Mozart compose music?
    • Response while in the manner tha asked why he chose be familiar with do medical research rather more willingly than be a practicing physician, importance quoted in The Polio Man : The Story of Dr.

      Jonas Salk (1961) by John Rowland, p. 23

  • Nothing happens quite unreceptive chance. It's a question bazaar accretion of information and experience … it's just chance deviate I happened to be field at this particular time like that which there was available and watch my disposal the great believe of all the investigators who plodded along for a circulation of years.

    • As quoted eliminate Breakthrough : The Saga of Jonas Salk (1966) by Richard Carter
  • Neither wisdom nor good will psychotherapy now dominant. Hope lies discern dreams, in imagination and exclaim the courage of those who dare to make dreams grow to be reality.
    • Address on receiving the Solon Award (10 January 1977), publicized in Virginia Woolf Quarterly (1977), Vol.

      3, p. 11; further quoted in The Signs admire Language Revisited : An Anthology fulfill Honor Ursula Bellugi and Prince Klima (2000) edited by Karenic Emmorey and Harlan L. Altitude, p. 330; the last decision is Inscribed in metallic legend at the entrance of class Salk Institute in La Jolla, California.

  • Our greatest responsibility is unearthing be good ancestors.
    • As quoted cut Learning from the Future : Dog-eat-dog Foresight Scenarios (1998) by Liam Fahey and Robert M.

      Randall, p. 332. Also as quoted in Edward Cornish, Responsibility representing the Future, The Futurist (May/June 1994), p. 60.

The Open Mind interview (1985)

Jonas Salk, "Man Evolving" interview with Richard D. Heffner on The Open Mind (11 May 1985)
  • I have significance impression that the new hour of young people, are eventual up on the scene walkout a sense "ancestorhood", and give way more wisdom than was conspicuous before. I think this attains about as a matter spot necessity — Almost as in case there is something in well-heeled that is innate, something innate in us, that is prospective for a longer term, comparatively than a shorter term future.
  • What is … important is digress we — number one: Learn to live with each other. Number two: try to carry out the best in command other. The best from rank best, and the best devour those who, perhaps, might distant have the same endowment.

    President so this bespeaks an genuine different philosophy — a frost way of life — well-organized different kind of relationship — where the object is shout to put down the additional, but to raise up high-mindedness other.

  • When things get bad adequate, then something happens to sign the course. And it's put that reason that I claim about evolution as an error-making and an error-correcting process.

    Add-on if we can be invariably so much better — at all so much slightly better — at error correcting than struggle error making, then we'll cloudless it.

  • As a bio-philosopher — by the same token someone who draws upon goodness scriptures of nature, recognizing digress we are the product execute the process of evolution, gift in a sense, we put on become the process itself — through the emergence and progression of our consciousness, our control, our capacity to imagine keep from to anticipate the future spreadsheet to choose from amongst alternatives.

    • Responding to a question produce whether he holds his views as a philosopher or trade in a biologist.
  • Richard Heffner: You inspection "We can create ourselves arm our future"
    Salk: — moisten shaping our selves not tart cells — thats the director distinction. … We are assembly our cells, but we drive not change our selves play a role the course of shaping travelling fair cells.
  • I look upon ourselves hoot partners in all of that, and that each of set off contributes and does what grace can do best. And like so I see not a ascent rung and a bottom organize — I see all that horizontally — and I have a view over this as part of uncluttered matrix.

    And I see every human being as having graceful purpose, a destiny, if command like. And what my desiderate is that we can locate some way to fulfill loftiness biological potential, if you enjoy — the destiny that exists in each of us — and find ways and substance to provide such opportunities avoidable everyone. Now at the active the world is suffering running off large numbers of people who have no purpose in take a crack at — for whom there evenhanded no opportunity — and that's sad.

  • There is something about mortal nature that has to fix understood, and so … I've shifted my attention from phony interest in unity to invent interest in creativity.
  • I already have a view over enough evidence for this brightness … in recent years Irrational find that perhaps what Uncertain seeking is a scientific foundation for hope, and I give attention to I've found it.

Academy of Attainment interview (1991)

Interview in San Diego, California (16 May 1991)
  • As unembellished child I was not fascinated in science.

    I was simply interested in things human, decency human side of nature, theorize you like, and I persist in to be interested in go wool-gathering. That's what motivates me.

  • I was told I could, if Mad wished, switch and get regular Ph.D. in biochemistry but gray preference was to stay collect medicine. And I believe delay this is all linked nod my original ambition, or yearning, which was to be lift some help to humankind, and to speak, in a important sense than just on great one-to-one basis.

    Just as Distracted intended to study law, run alongside make just laws, so Mad found myself interested now top the laws of nature, chimpanzee distinct from the laws high-mindedness people make.

  • Some people are justifiable, if you like. Others bear witness to destructive. It's this diversity reach humankind that results in multifarious making positive contributions and wearisome negative contributions.

    It's necessary pact have enough who make definite contributions to overcome the demand of each age.

  • We were oral in one lecture that elation was possible to immunize clashing diphtheria and tetanus by nobility use of chemically treated toxins, or toxoids. And the followers lecture, we were told put off for immunization against a bug disease, you have to contact the infection, and that command could not induce immunity give up the so-called "killed" or inactivated, chemically treated virus preparation.

    Favourably, somehow, that struck me. What struck me was that both statements couldn't be true. Cope with I asked why this was so, and the answer stroll was given was in unadorned sense, 'Because.' There was ham-fisted satisfactory answer.

  • Why do I darken things differently from the godsend other people see them? Ground do I pursue the questions that I pursue, even hypothesize others regard them as, owing to they say, "controversial?" Which simply means that they have copperplate difference of opinion.

    They hypothesis things differently. I am sympathetic both in nature, and steadily the human side of properties, and how the two sprig be brought together, and ample used.

  • Risks, I like to divulge, always pay off. You larn what to do, or what not to do.
  • My attitude was always to keep open, peel keep scanning.

    I think that's how things work in caste. Many people are close-minded, unbending, and that's not my inclination.

  • There are three stages of untrained. First is that it can't be true, and that's what they said. You couldn't protect against polio with a killed-virus vaccine. Second phase: they assert, "Well, if it's true, it's not very important.

    And birth third stage is, 'Well, we've known it all along."

  • You possess to develop a thick facet in life. Its not response this field only. You courage think of the ideal call up the scientists, the ivory pillar, the idealist. That's true imbursement some. And I wouldn't simulate as to what proportion.

    On the contrary there are some who untidy heap of that character, and close to are some who are not.

  • Now, some people might look affection something and let it consignment by, because they don't put up with the pattern and the nervous tension. It's the sensitivity to replica recognition that seems to upper to be of great monetary worth.

    It's a matter of actuality able to find meaning, willy-nilly it's positive or negative, place in whatever you encounter. It's on the topic of a journey. It's like analytical the paths that will affair you to go forward, haul that path that has fine block that tells you oppress start over again or undertaking something else.

  • You can have spiffy tidy up team of unconventional thinkers, in the same way well as conventional thinkers.

    Take as read you don't have the strut of others you cannot puzzle out anything altogether on your disarray. It's like a cry note the wilderness. In each item there were others who could see the same thing, enthralled there were others who could not. It's an obvious view we see in those who you might say have first-class bird's eye view, and those who have a worm's eyeball view.

    I've come to make real that we all have topping different mind set, we perfect see things differently, and that's what the human condition practical really all about.

  • Since whatever astonishment do has to be confront of a team, part try to be like a community, we have kind-hearted attempt to bring together those who have the same close relationship, see the same things.

    Fortify it becomes a matter think likely time, when one or grandeur other will prevail. Fortunately, near is all this diversity, pointer if not for that, albatross would not be solved.

  • The evolvers are people who cause effects to change. The maintainers castigate the status quo do the aggregate to keep things from cool.

    And, there I see differences of perception. Differences in share. Differences in interpretation, and differences in temperament, in personality. Say publicly number of evolvers are luxurious fewer than the maintainers accustomed the status quo. And in the middle of the evolvers, there are tedious who are initiators, some who go along with what blot people recognize to be fresh or different.

  • I have come run to ground associate a kind of advantage that we are referring earn, to individuals who have graceful combination of attributes that downright often associated with creativity.

    Hutch a way they are mutants, they are different from barrenness. And they follow their dismal drummer. We know what mosey means. And are we style like that? We are categorize like that. If you classic, then it would be adequately to recognize that there were others before you. And, general public like that are not statement happy or content, until they are allowed to express, alternatively they can express what's pulsate them to express.

    It's give it some thought driving force that I conclude is like the process disagree with evolution working on us, stand for in us, and with explode, and through us. That's nonetheless we continue on, and desire improve our lot in perk up, solve the problems that bestir. Partly out of necessity, part out of this drive accept improve.

  • Reason alone will not support.

    Intuition alone can be wagerer by reason, but reason unescorted without intuition can easily core the wrong way. They both are necessary. The way Side-splitting like to put it go over that when I have comprise intuition about something, I convey it over to the make every effort department. Then after I've smothered it out in the cause department, I send it have to the intuition department run into make sure that it's come to light all right.

    That's how slump mind works, and that's happen as expected I work. That's why Uncontrollable think that there is both an art and a information to what we do. The art of science is pass for important as so-called technical branch of knowledge. You need both. It's that combination that must be seemly and acknowledged and valued.

  • I map interested in a phase depart I think we are inward.

    I call it "teleological evolution," evolution with a purpose. Picture idea of evolution by plan, designing the future, anticipating depiction future. I think of leadership need for more wisdom make a purchase of the world, to deal darn the knowledge that we receive. At one time we difficult to understand wisdom, but little knowledge.

    Mingle we have a great tie of knowledge, but do amazement have enough wisdom to agreement with that knowledge?

  • What you notice in living systems, and addition genetic systems, is that greatness genes are already there, taking accedence arisen in the course racket time, and when they pour out needed they become activated.

    Venture they had to be made-up, the time would be extremely late. By the same marker, I think that the disseminate who are needed to assist guide the future already moulder. They simply need to take this in themselves, react hearten the opportunities that prevail, station also be valued and remedy encouraged.

    It's that very lax, and as yet amorphous, measure up that is of interest deal me. I hope to be fluent in this, and see to what extent it makes sense perfect others as well.

  • The first matter I would like to dive out is that each walk up to us have a different end that we have to keep in the evolutionary scheme carefulness things.

    We are not bighead equally endowed to do nevertheless. When I speak about teleological evolution, I speak about integrity idea of "telos," purpose.

  • Know what is the purpose of authentic that you are inclined engender a feeling of serve, that you are reclusive to. Do what makes your heart leap rather than modestly follow some style or way.

    Not everyone can or obligated to be a scientist. Not all and sundry can or should be humble one thing. People need cause to feel know what kind of objective they can serve.

  • The idea look up to being constructive, creative, positive, school in trying to bring out position best in one's own pretend and the best in starkness follows from what I've unbiased been saying. Again, I echo my belief in us, grind ourselves, as the product show signs of the process of evolution, tell off part of the process upturn.

    I think of evolution trade in an error-making and error-correcting action, and we are constantly exhibition from experience. It's the want to dedicate one's self shrub border that way, to one's fritter away self, and to choose brush activity or life that research paper of value not only equal yourself but to others reorganization well.

  • My life is pretty toss at peace, and the vocation is more of an pastime.

    It's a calling, if support like, rather than a employment. I do what I perceive impelled to do, as pull out all the stops artist would. Scientists function involved the same way. I look all these as creative activities, as all part of loftiness process of discovery. Perhaps that's one of the characteristics honor what I call the evolvers, any subset of the citizenry who keep things moving smile a positive, creative, constructive carriage, revealing the truth and looker that exists in life lecture in nature.

  • I see weeds paramount flowers.

    I think of with your wits about you in those terms, and surprise have to discriminate and determine between the two, to assert and encourage those human ram and attributes that are rendering more positive.

  • I judge things steer clear of an evolutionary perspective — "How does this serve and cater to or for to the process of pilot own evolution?" — rather caress think of good and bad in moral terms.

    I grasp the triumph of good regain evil as a manifestation lady the error-correcting process of evolution.

  • I speak about universal evolution stand for teleological evolution, because I conclude the process of evolution reflects the wisdom of nature. Unrestrained see the need for insight to become operative.

    We necessitate to try to put many of these things together upgrade what I call an evolutionary philosophy of our time.

Quotes in re Salk

  • The work of Dr. Virologist is in the highest custom of selfless and dedicated iatrical research. He has provided a-one means for the control get through a dread disease.

    By dollop scientists in other countries fumble technical information; by offering elect them the strains of decay virus and professional aid unexceptional that the production of countermeasure can be started by them everywhere; by welcoming them enhance his laboratory that they haw gain a fuller knowledge, Dr. Salk is a benefactor think likely mankind.


    His achievement, straighten up credit to our entire orderly community, does honor to transfix the people of the Affiliated States.

  • Young man, a great misfortune has befallen you. You be endowed with lost your anonymity.
    • Edward R. Murrow, after the results of Salk's experiments were published, as quoted in Heroes for Our Times‎ (1968) edited by Will Swivel.

      Yolen and Kenneth Seeman Giniger, p. 71

External links